On Thursday 18 September 2003 10:04 am, Renaud Deraison wrote: > Is anyone still experiencing false positives with msrpc_dcom2.nasl rev1.20 > or newer ?
I figured out why I was getting my false positive with 1.21 and Solaris. A while back I edited /etc/inetd.conf to have telnet listen on port 135. This was a cheap way to get a listener on that port for some of my testing. This ends up looking like a vulnerable system to msrpc_dcom2.nasl. I'm not sure if this counts as a true false positive after all but figured I'd at least clarify the issue. Thanks, Beirne -- Beirne "Bern" Konarski [EMAIL PROTECTED] "Untouched by Scandal"
