Greetings, I've been poking around the CGI abuse plugins, focusing on how things are handled when dealing with a web server that doesn't return proper "404 not found" pages. As I understand it, no404.nasl will store a pattern in the kb that is_cgi_installed should search for when requesting a CGI abuse that returns an HTTP 200 status code.
Why would a plugin depend on no404.nasl but not make a call to is_cgi_installed? Of the ~600 CGI abuse plugins, only 120 make a call to is_cgi_installed. Thanks, Erik
