ONeill Jack wrote:

> scanrand is a scanner like nmap, but it seems to be
> very fast. So it may be interesting to include it in
> Nessus, doesn't it ?

I'd rather use a regular TCP stack for discovering open services because
it's known to work reliably.  With kqueue/epoll, it should be possible
to implement *very* fast scanners.  (Just with poll(2), I reach about
one million addresses per hour.)

Congestion can indeed result in problems for such scanners.  A regular
TCP stack won't help that much (except for being slower 8-).  It's
important to connect the scanning machine to a core router and
distribute the targets rather well.

Reply via email to