I don't see a ms_kb835732.nasl (perhaps you meant ms_kb835732_ssl.nasl (12204)), but we've been using smb_kb835732.nasl (12209) without any false positives. We have seen a few where the update has been applied but the machine hasn't been rebooted, but as I understand it they're still vulnerable so it's not quite a false positive.
On Fri, 30 Apr 2004, David Kyle Sayre wrote: > Hello All, > > We would like to use nessus for scanning for the vulnerability in the > CAN-2003-0533. We have tried to use ms_kb835732 which covers the > ms04-011 patch, but we are getting a lot of false positives over the > dsscan utility available from foundstone.com. I was wondering if anyone > was working on a better test for the CAN-2003-0533 vulnerability? > > On a separate note, ftp://www.cert.mil is not available, to I could > find (I did look through google) which one of the plethora of > vulnerabilities in ms04-011 this was. Could anyone enlighten me? > > Thanks, > David Sayre > Los Alamos National Labs > > _______________________________________________ > Nessus mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://mail.nessus.org/mailman/listinfo/nessus > -- Public key #7BBC68D9 at | Shane Williams http://pgp.mit.edu/ | System Admin - UT iSchool =----------------------------------+------------------------------- All syllogisms contain three lines | [EMAIL PROTECTED] Therefore this is not a syllogism | www.ischool.utexas.edu/~shanew _______________________________________________ Nessus mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.nessus.org/mailman/listinfo/nessus
