Michael, On 2012-12-10 23:35, Michael McMahon wrote: > Could I get the following webrevs reviewed please? > They are identical changes (except for one small change suggested by > Dmitry) > to what was done in 8 for the same issues > > http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~michaelm/7200720.7u-dev/webrev.1/
I see a comment // MMM 7200720 ?? at ll: 202 of NTLMAuthentication.java - Does it make sense to change it to something more verbose? Otherwise looks good for me. > http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~michaelm/8003948.7u-dev/webrev.1/ Looks good for me. -Dmitry -- Dmitry Samersoff Oracle Java development team, Saint Petersburg, Russia * Give Rabbit time, and he'll always get the answer
