On 12/28/2012 10:49 AM, John Zavgren wrote: Please consider the following webrev for JDK-8005120. http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~mullan/webrevs/jzavgren/8005120/webrev.06/
(I apologize for overlooking an error in the windows code that I created in my previous release. ) Thanks! John Zavgren -------------------------------------------------------------- Greetings: I modified windows source code files so they pass size_t for buffer sizes and socklen_t for address structures. http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~mullan/webrevs/jzavgren/8005120/webrev.03/ Please let me know what you think. Thanks! On 12/26/2012 02:56 PM, John Zavgren wrote: Greetings: I modified the windows code so that it uses socklen_t to specify the lengths of data structures, parameter lengths, etc. instead of ints (which can be negative.) http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~mullan/webrevs/jzavgren/8005120/webrev.02/ Thanks! John Zavgren On 12/20/2012 05:47 PM, John Zavgren wrote: Greetings: I modified my changes so that windows knows the definition of the POSIX data type: socklen_t, and now all the system calls are using the "doctrinaire" data types. Please consider the following update. http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~mullan/webrevs/jzavgren/8005120/webrev.01/ Thanks! John Zavgren On 20/12/2012 13:49, John Zavgren wrote: Greetings: I agree that the "correct" way to fix this problem is to use POSIX data types, e.g., socklen_t. However, when I switch to the doctrinaire data type, the build fails on windows machines: ------------- build monologue ----- c:\jprt\t\p1\032220.jzavgren\s\jdk\src\share\transport\socket\sysSocket.h(39) : error C2146: syntax error : missing ')' before identifier 'len' c:\jprt\t\p1\032220.jzavgren\s\jdk\src\share\transport\socket\sysSocket.h(39) : error C2081: 'socklen_t' : name in formal parameter list illegal c:\jprt\t\p1\032220.jzavgren\s\jdk\src\share\transport\socket\sysSocket.h(39) : error C2061: syntax error : identifier 'len' c:\jprt\t\p1\032220.jzavgren\s\jdk\src\share\transport\socket\sysSocket.h(39) : error C2059: syntax error : ';' c:\jprt\t\p1\032220.jzavgren\s\jdk\src\share\transport\socket\sysSocket.h(39) : error C2059: syntax error : ')' .... ------------- build monologue ----- I used alternative types, e.g., uint32_t, etc. as a way to avoid the limitations of windows. What is the recommended way to accommodate this windows limitation? Shall I use a typedef statement to define "socklen_t"? We don't suffer from this issue in the networking native code. The unix and windows implementations are distinct. I see the vm defines socklen_t in a windows specific header, hotspot/src/os/windows/vm/jvm_windows.h, as typedef int socklen_t; ...and it is then used in shared code, like jvm.cpp, and the hpi, by optionally including #ifdef TARGET_OS_FAMILY_windows # include "jvm_windows.h" #endif We could use a similar, but more simplistic, approach here. -Chris. Thanks! ----- Original Message ----- From: chris.hega...@oracle.com To: david.hol...@oracle.com Cc: alan.bate...@oracle.com , serviceability-...@openjdk.java.net , john.zavg...@oracle.com , net-dev@openjdk.java.net Sent: Thursday, December 20, 2012 7:41:07 AM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern Subject: Re: RFR JDK-8005120 On 19/12/2012 20:52, David Holmes wrote: Real sense of deja-vu here. Didn't we go through this same thing with the HPI socket routines? Yes, and the networking native code too. I think it is best to use socklen_t for the unix code. From what I can see making these changes, to use socklen_t, should be relatively localized. -Chris. Depending on the OS (and version?) we should be using socklen_t not int and not uint32_t. David On 20/12/2012 2:35 AM, Chris Hegarty wrote: John, I grabbed your patch, and with it I now see different warnings. ../../../../src/share/transport/socket/socketTransport.c: In function 'socketTransport_startListening': ../../../../src/share/transport/socket/socketTransport.c:310:40: warning: pointer targets in passing argument 3 of 'dbgsysGetSocketName' differ in signedness [-Wpointer-sign] ../../../../src/share/transport/socket/sysSocket.h:58:5: note: expected 'uint32_t *' but argument is of type 'int *' ../../../../src/share/transport/socket/socketTransport.c: In function 'socketTransport_accept': ../../../../src/share/transport/socket/socketTransport.c:371:33: warning: pointer targets in passing argument 3 of 'dbgsysAccept' differ in signedness [-Wpointer-sign] ../../../../src/share/transport/socket/sysSocket.h:41:5: note: expected 'uint32_t *' but argument is of type 'int *' Do you see these in your build? -Chris. On 12/19/2012 03:42 PM, Alan Bateman wrote: John - this is the debugger socket transport so cc'ing the serviceability-dev list as that is where this code is maintained. On 19/12/2012 15:36, John Zavgren wrote: Greetings: Please consider the following change to the two files: src/share/transport/socket/sysSocket.h src/solaris/transport/socket/socket_md.c that eliminate compiler warnings that stem from the fact that the variables that the native code passes to various system calls were not declared correctly. They were declared as integers, but they must be "unsigned" integers because they are used to define buffer lengths. Were one to supply a negative value as an argument, it would be cast into an unsigned "Martian" value and there'd be (hopefully) a system call error. Thanks! John Zavgren http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~mullan/webrevs/jzavgren/8005120/ -- John Zavgren john.zavg...@oracle.com 603-821-0904 US-Burlington-MA
