> On 1 Aug 2016, at 12:03, Pavel Rappo <pavel.ra...@oracle.com> wrote:
> ...    return len;
> 
> 5. I believe we should add 8162876 to @bug

Strictly speaking, we should not. The @bug should capture the bug numbers
that the test exercises the changes for. It is not necessary to include the bug
number for a bug to the test itself.

>  25  * @bug 4937598
> 
> Otherwise I find this version to be more robust and readable.

+1

-Chris.

Reply via email to