> On 1 Aug 2016, at 12:03, Pavel Rappo <pavel.ra...@oracle.com> wrote: > ... return len; > > 5. I believe we should add 8162876 to @bug
Strictly speaking, we should not. The @bug should capture the bug numbers that the test exercises the changes for. It is not necessary to include the bug number for a bug to the test itself. > 25 * @bug 4937598 > > Otherwise I find this version to be more robust and readable. +1 -Chris.