On 9/13/2017 8:52 AM, Rob McKenna wrote:
That's a concerns of mine. In order to work for your countermeasure, applications have to set receiving timeout, and take care of the closing timeout when evaluate what's a right timeout value. The mixing could be misleading and not easy to use.W.r.t. a separate timeout, the underlying mechanics of a close already depend on the readTimeout in this situation.
Xuelei
