On Thu, 12 May 2022 14:15:43 GMT, Daniel Fuchs <dfu...@openjdk.org> wrote:
>>> OK - I will change codeLengthOf as suggested. It was not immediately >>> obvious to me that the values would fit in the first 31 bits. >> >> In fact, it would even fit into the first 30 bits. There's a top-level >> comment that explains the layout of `code` elements. Maybe you can improve >> it somehow or carry over that specific part about the length into >> `codeLengthOf`. Alternatively, you can always slap `assert` in >> `codeLengthOf`. > > Did I understand correctly that the lower 32 bits is expected to contain a > length coded on 5 bits - which is expected to be a value in (5..30)? Yes, you did understand that correctly. ------------- PR: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/8656
