On Thu, 24 Aug 2023 02:23:05 GMT, Glavo <[email protected]> wrote:

>> I mainly made these optimizations:
>> 
>> * Avoid allocating `StringBuilder` when there are no characters in the URL 
>> that need to be encoded;
>> * Implement a fast path for UTF-8.
>> 
>> In addition to improving performance, these optimizations also reduce 
>> temporary objects:
>> 
>> * It no longer allocates any object when there are no characters in the URL 
>> that need to be encoded;
>> * The initial size of StringBuilder is larger to avoid expansion as much as 
>> possible;
>> * For UTF-8, the temporary `CharArrayWriter`, strings and byte arrays are no 
>> longer needed.
>> 
>> The results of the `URLEncodeDecode` benchmark:
>> 
>> 
>> Before:
>> Benchmark                       (count)  (maxLength)  (mySeed)  Mode  Cnt  
>> Score   Error  Units
>> URLEncodeDecode.testEncodeUTF8     1024         1024         3  avgt   15  
>> 5.587 ? 0.010  ms/op
>> 
>> After:
>> Benchmark                       (count)  (maxLength)  (mySeed)  Mode  Cnt  
>> Score   Error  Units
>> URLEncodeDecode.testEncodeUTF8     1024         1024         3  avgt   15  
>> 3.582 ? 0.054  ms/op
>> 
>> 
>> I also updated the tests to add more test cases.
>
> Glavo has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional commit 
> since the last revision:
> 
>   Add final modifier

I am not sure the added complexity is worth the gain. It's fine for String to 
have special knowledge of UTF-8 but I don't think we want that to bleed all 
over the place.

-------------

PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/15354#issuecomment-1691360427

Reply via email to