On Thu, 29 Jan 2026 12:05:59 GMT, Daniel Fuchs <[email protected]> wrote:
> It's a bit unfortunate that we don't have a means to test this reliably on > windows. Do we really need to allow for backlog + 512 sockets? Can we go with > backlog + 8 instead? `backlog + 2` already works in all supported platforms. 512 is a hard limit to give up on exhausting the admission queue. In practice, max. 2 extra sockets do the job. > If we're now using the loopback there should no longer be any "No route to > host" or "Unresolved address" exceptions, should it? I'd guess so — hard to say for all platforms. ------------- PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/29431#issuecomment-3817318841
