net-dev  

Messages by Thread

• Re: RFR: 8348986: Improve coverage of enhanced exception messages [v20] Michael McMahon
  • Re: RFR: 8348986: Improve coverage of enhanced exception messages [v20] Daniel Fuchs
• RFR: 8358496: Concurrent reading from Socket with timeout executes sequentially Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8358496: Concurrent reading from Socket with timeout executes sequentially Daniel Fuchs
  • Re: RFR: 8358496: Concurrent reading from Socket with timeout executes sequentially [v2] Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8358496: Concurrent reading from Socket with timeout executes sequentially [v2] Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8358496: Concurrent reading from Socket with timeout executes sequentially [v2] Daniel Fuchs
  • Integrated: 8358496: Concurrent reading from Socket with timeout executes sequentially Alan Bateman
• Re: RFR: 8325766: Review seclibs tests for cert expiry [v5] Matthew Donovan
  • Re: RFR: 8325766: Review seclibs tests for cert expiry [v5] Artur Barashev
  • Re: RFR: 8325766: Review seclibs tests for cert expiry [v5] Artur Barashev
• Re: RFR: 8348986: Improve coverage of enhanced exception messages [v19] Michael McMahon
  • Re: RFR: 8348986: Improve coverage of enhanced exception messages [v19] Daniel Fuchs
• RFR: 8351594: JFR: Rate-limited sampling of Java events Erik Gahlin
  • Re: RFR: 8351594: JFR: Rate-limited sampling of Java events Markus Grönlund
  • Re: RFR: 8351594: JFR: Rate-limited sampling of Java events Erik Gahlin
  • Re: RFR: 8351594: JFR: Rate-limited sampling of Java events [v2] Markus Grönlund
  • Re: RFR: 8351594: JFR: Rate-limited sampling of Java events Markus Grönlund
  • Re: RFR: 8351594: JFR: Rate-limited sampling of Java events Markus Grönlund
  • Re: RFR: 8351594: JFR: Rate-limited sampling of Java events Markus Grönlund
  • Re: RFR: 8351594: JFR: Rate-limited sampling of Java events Markus Grönlund
  • Re: RFR: 8351594: JFR: Rate-limited sampling of Java events [v2] Erik Gahlin
  • Re: RFR: 8351594: JFR: Rate-limited sampling of Java events Markus Grönlund
  • Re: RFR: 8351594: JFR: Rate-limited sampling of Java events Markus Grönlund
  • Re: RFR: 8351594: JFR: Rate-limited sampling of Java events Markus Grönlund
  • Re: RFR: 8351594: JFR: Rate-limited sampling of Java events Markus Grönlund
  • Re: RFR: 8351594: JFR: Rate-limited sampling of Java events Markus Grönlund
  • Re: RFR: 8351594: JFR: Rate-limited sampling of Java events [v2] Erik Gahlin
  • Re: RFR: 8351594: JFR: Rate-limited sampling of Java events [v2] Volkan Yazici
  • Re: RFR: 8351594: JFR: Rate-limited sampling of Java events [v2] Erik Gahlin
  • Re: RFR: 8351594: JFR: Rate-limited sampling of Java events [v3] Erik Gahlin
  • Re: RFR: 8351594: JFR: Rate-limited sampling of Java events [v3] Markus Grönlund
  • Re: RFR: 8351594: JFR: Rate-limited sampling of Java events [v3] Erik Gahlin
  • Re: RFR: 8351594: JFR: Rate-limited sampling of Java events [v3] Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8351594: JFR: Rate-limited sampling of Java events [v3] Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8351594: JFR: Rate-limited sampling of Java events [v3] Erik Gahlin
  • Re: RFR: 8351594: JFR: Rate-limited sampling of Java events [v3] Erik Gahlin
  • Re: RFR: 8351594: JFR: Rate-limited sampling of Java events [v3] Stuart Marks
  • Re: RFR: 8351594: JFR: Rate-limited sampling of Java events [v3] Erik Gahlin
  • Re: RFR: 8351594: JFR: Rate-limited sampling of Java events [v3] Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8351594: JFR: Rate-limited sampling of Java events [v4] Erik Gahlin
  • Re: RFR: 8351594: JFR: Rate-limited sampling of Java events [v5] Erik Gahlin
  • Re: RFR: 8351594: JFR: Rate-limited sampling of Java events [v6] Erik Gahlin
  • Re: RFR: 8351594: JFR: Rate-limited sampling of Java events [v6] Andrey Turbanov
  • Re: RFR: 8351594: JFR: Rate-limited sampling of Java events [v7] Erik Gahlin
  • Re: RFR: 8351594: JFR: Rate-limited sampling of Java events [v7] Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8351594: JFR: Rate-limited sampling of Java events [v8] Erik Gahlin
  • Re: RFR: 8351594: JFR: Rate-limited sampling of Java events [v8] Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8351594: JFR: Rate-limited sampling of Java events [v8] Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8351594: JFR: Rate-limited sampling of Java events [v8] Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8351594: JFR: Rate-limited sampling of Java events [v8] Erik Gahlin
  • Re: RFR: 8351594: JFR: Rate-limited sampling of Java events [v9] Erik Gahlin
  • Re: RFR: 8351594: JFR: Rate-limited sampling of Java events [v9] Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8351594: JFR: Rate-limited sampling of Java events [v9] Erik Gahlin
  • Re: RFR: 8351594: JFR: Rate-limited sampling of Java events [v9] Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8351594: JFR: Rate-limited sampling of Java events [v9] Erik Gahlin
  • Re: RFR: 8351594: JFR: Rate-limited sampling of Java events [v9] Markus Grönlund
  • Integrated: 8351594: JFR: Rate-limited sampling of Java events Erik Gahlin
• Integrated: 8341346: Add support for exporting TLS Keying Material Bradford Wetmore
• Re: RFR: 8341346: Add support for exporting TLS Keying Material [v30] Bradford Wetmore
  • Re: RFR: 8341346: Add support for exporting TLS Keying Material [v30] Jamil Nimeh
  • Re: RFR: 8341346: Add support for exporting TLS Keying Material [v30] Hai-May Chao
• Re: RFR: 8341346: Add support for exporting TLS Keying Material [v29] Bradford Wetmore
• Re: RFR: 8348986: Improve coverage of enhanced exception messages [v18] Michael McMahon
• Re: RFR: 8348986: Improve coverage of enhanced exception messages [v17] Michael McMahon
• Re: RFR: 8325766: Review seclibs tests for cert expiry [v4] Sean Mullan
  • Re: RFR: 8325766: Review seclibs tests for cert expiry [v4] Matthew Donovan
  • Re: RFR: 8325766: Review seclibs tests for cert expiry [v4] Sean Mullan
  • Re: RFR: 8325766: Review seclibs tests for cert expiry [v4] Matthew Donovan
  • Re: RFR: 8325766: Review seclibs tests for cert expiry [v4] Sean Mullan
  • Re: RFR: 8325766: Review seclibs tests for cert expiry [v4] Matthew Donovan
• Re: RFR: 8348986: Improve coverage of enhanced exception messages [v16] Michael McMahon
  • Re: RFR: 8348986: Improve coverage of enhanced exception messages [v16] Sean Mullan
  • Re: RFR: 8348986: Improve coverage of enhanced exception messages [v16] Michael McMahon
  • Re: RFR: 8348986: Improve coverage of enhanced exception messages [v16] Sean Mullan
  • Re: RFR: 8348986: Improve coverage of enhanced exception messages [v16] Alan Bateman
• Re: RFR: 8348986: Improve coverage of enhanced exception messages [v15] Michael McMahon
  • Re: RFR: 8348986: Improve coverage of enhanced exception messages [v15] Michael McMahon
• Re: RFR: 8348986: Improve coverage of enhanced exception messages [v14] Michael McMahon
• Re: RFR: 8341346: Add support for exporting TLS Keying Material [v28] Bradford Wetmore
  • Re: RFR: 8341346: Add support for exporting TLS Keying Material [v28] Weijun Wang
  • Re: RFR: 8341346: Add support for exporting TLS Keying Material [v28] Jamil Nimeh
  • Re: RFR: 8341346: Add support for exporting TLS Keying Material [v28] Hai-May Chao
• Re: RFR: 8337143: (fc, fs) Move filesystem-related native objects from libnio to libjava [v14] Brian Burkhalter
• Re: RFR: 8348986: Improve coverage of enhanced exception messages [v13] Michael McMahon
  • Re: RFR: 8348986: Improve coverage of enhanced exception messages [v13] Daniel Fuchs
  • Re: RFR: 8348986: Improve coverage of enhanced exception messages [v13] Michael McMahon
• RFR: 8228773: URLClassLoader constructors should include API note warning that the parent should not be null Jaikiran Pai
  • Re: RFR: 8228773: URLClassLoader constructors should include API note warning that the parent should not be null Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8228773: URLClassLoader constructors should include API note warning that the parent should not be null [v2] Jaikiran Pai
  • Re: RFR: 8228773: URLClassLoader constructors should include API note warning that the parent should not be null Daniel Fuchs
  • Re: RFR: 8228773: URLClassLoader constructors should include API note warning that the parent should not be null [v2] Jaikiran Pai
  • Re: RFR: 8228773: URLClassLoader constructors should include API note warning that the parent should not be null [v2] Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8228773: URLClassLoader constructors should include API note warning that the parent should not be null [v2] Jaikiran Pai
  • Re: RFR: 8228773: URLClassLoader constructors should include API note warning that the parent should not be null [v2] Jaikiran Pai
  • Re: RFR: 8228773: URLClassLoader constructors should include API note warning that the parent should not be null [v3] Jaikiran Pai
  • Re: RFR: 8228773: URLClassLoader constructors should include API note warning that the parent should not be null [v3] Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8228773: URLClassLoader constructors should include API note warning that the parent should not be null [v3] Jaikiran Pai
  • Re: RFR: 8228773: URLClassLoader constructors should include API note warning that the parent should not be null [v2] Jaikiran Pai
  • Re: RFR: 8228773: URLClassLoader constructors should include API note warning that the parent should not be null [v3] Jaikiran Pai
  • Re: RFR: 8228773: URLClassLoader constructors should include API note warning that the parent should not be null [v3] Daniel Fuchs
  • Re: RFR: 8228773: URLClassLoader constructors should include API note warning that the parent should not be null [v3] Sean Mullan
  • Re: RFR: 8228773: URLClassLoader constructors should include API note warning that the parent should not be null [v3] Jaikiran Pai
  • Re: RFR: 8228773: URLClassLoader constructors should include API note warning that the parent should not be null [v4] Jaikiran Pai
  • Re: RFR: 8228773: URLClassLoader constructors should include API note warning that the parent should not be null [v4] Jaikiran Pai
  • Re: RFR: 8228773: URLClassLoader constructors should include API note warning that the parent should not be null [v4] Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8228773: URLClassLoader constructors should include API note warning that the parent should not be null [v4] Sean Mullan
  • Re: RFR: 8228773: URLClassLoader constructors should include API note warning that the parent should not be null [v4] Jaikiran Pai
  • Integrated: 8228773: URLClassLoader constructors should include API note warning that the parent should not be null Jaikiran Pai
• Re: RFR: 8341346: Add support for exporting TLS Keying Material [v27] Bradford Wetmore
  • Re: RFR: 8341346: Add support for exporting TLS Keying Material [v27] Hai-May Chao
  • Re: RFR: 8341346: Add support for exporting TLS Keying Material [v27] Bradford Wetmore
  • Re: RFR: 8341346: Add support for exporting TLS Keying Material [v27] Weijun Wang
  • Re: RFR: 8341346: Add support for exporting TLS Keying Material [v27] Bradford Wetmore
  • Re: RFR: 8341346: Add support for exporting TLS Keying Material [v27] Bradford Wetmore
  • Re: RFR: 8341346: Add support for exporting TLS Keying Material [v27] Bradford Wetmore
  • Re: RFR: 8341346: Add support for exporting TLS Keying Material [v27] Bradford Wetmore
  • Re: RFR: 8341346: Add support for exporting TLS Keying Material [v27] Bradford Wetmore
  • Re: RFR: 8341346: Add support for exporting TLS Keying Material [v27] Hai-May Chao
  • Re: RFR: 8341346: Add support for exporting TLS Keying Material [v27] Hai-May Chao
• Re: RFR: 8348986: Improve coverage of enhanced exception messages [v12] Michael McMahon
  • Re: RFR: 8348986: Improve coverage of enhanced exception messages [v12] Mark Sheppard
  • Re: RFR: 8348986: Improve coverage of enhanced exception messages [v12] Michael McMahon
• Integrated: 7046003: Default value of Authenticator.getRequestingURL() is not specified kieran-farrell
• Re: RFR: 8348986: Improve coverage of enhanced exception messages [v11] Michael McMahon
  • Re: RFR: 8348986: Improve coverage of enhanced exception messages [v11] Daniel Fuchs
  • Re: RFR: 8348986: Improve coverage of enhanced exception messages [v11] Mark Sheppard
  • Re: RFR: 8348986: Improve coverage of enhanced exception messages [v11] Michael McMahon
  • Re: RFR: 8348986: Improve coverage of enhanced exception messages [v11] Mark Sheppard
  • Re: RFR: 8348986: Improve coverage of enhanced exception messages [v11] Mark Sheppard
  • Re: RFR: 8348986: Improve coverage of enhanced exception messages [v11] Michael McMahon
  • Re: RFR: 8348986: Improve coverage of enhanced exception messages [v11] Mark Sheppard
  • Re: RFR: 8348986: Improve coverage of enhanced exception messages [v11] Mark Sheppard
  • Re: RFR: 8348986: Improve coverage of enhanced exception messages [v11] Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8348986: Improve coverage of enhanced exception messages [v11] Mark Sheppard
  • Re: RFR: 8348986: Improve coverage of enhanced exception messages [v11] Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8348986: Improve coverage of enhanced exception messages [v11] Mark Sheppard
  • Re: RFR: 8348986: Improve coverage of enhanced exception messages [v11] Michael McMahon
• Re: RFR: 8341346: Add support for exporting TLS Keying Material [v26] Bradford Wetmore
  • Re: RFR: 8341346: Add support for exporting TLS Keying Material [v26] Artur Barashev
  • Re: RFR: 8341346: Add support for exporting TLS Keying Material [v26] Bradford Wetmore
• RE: Suggestion needed to port the fix to JDK17 and JDK11S Shruthi .
  • RE: Suggestion needed to port the fix to JDK17 and JDK11S Shruthi .
  • Re: Suggestion needed to port the fix to JDK17 and JDK11S Alan Bateman
  • RE: Suggestion needed to port the fix to JDK17 and JDK11S Shruthi .
• RFR: 8357639: DigestEchoClient fails intermittently due to: java.io.IOException: Data received while in pool Daniel Fuchs
  • Re: RFR: 8357639: DigestEchoClient fails intermittently due to: java.io.IOException: Data received while in pool [v2] Daniel Fuchs
  • Re: RFR: 8357639: DigestEchoClient fails intermittently due to: java.io.IOException: Data received while in pool [v3] Daniel Fuchs
  • Re: RFR: 8357639: DigestEchoClient fails intermittently due to: java.io.IOException: Data received while in pool [v3] Daniel Fuchs
  • Re: RFR: 8357639: DigestEchoClient fails intermittently due to: java.io.IOException: Data received while in pool [v4] Daniel Fuchs
  • Re: RFR: 8357639: DigestEchoClient fails intermittently due to: java.io.IOException: Data received while in pool [v4] Daniel Jeliński
  • Re: RFR: 8357639: DigestEchoClient fails intermittently due to: java.io.IOException: Data received while in pool [v4] Daniel Fuchs
  • Re: RFR: 8357639: DigestEchoClient fails intermittently due to: java.io.IOException: Data received while in pool [v5] Daniel Fuchs
  • Re: RFR: 8357639: DigestEchoClient fails intermittently due to: java.io.IOException: Data received while in pool [v5] Daniel Jeliński
  • Integrated: 8357639: DigestEchoClient fails intermittently due to: java.io.IOException: Data received while in pool Daniel Fuchs
• Re: RFR: 8341346: Add support for exporting TLS Keying Material [v25] Bradford Wetmore
• RFR: 8357539: TimeSource.now() is not monotonic Daniel Jeliński
  • Re: RFR: 8357539: TimeSource.now() is not monotonic Daniel Fuchs
  • Re: RFR: 8357539: TimeSource.now() is not monotonic Jaikiran Pai
  • Re: RFR: 8357539: TimeSource.now() is not monotonic Daniel Fuchs
  • Re: RFR: 8357539: TimeSource.now() is not monotonic Daniel Jeliński
  • Re: RFR: 8357539: TimeSource.now() is not monotonic [v2] Daniel Jeliński
  • Re: RFR: 8357539: TimeSource.now() is not monotonic [v2] Daniel Fuchs
  • Re: RFR: 8357539: TimeSource.now() is not monotonic [v2] Jaikiran Pai
  • Re: RFR: 8357539: TimeSource.now() is not monotonic [v3] Daniel Jeliński
  • Re: RFR: 8357539: TimeSource.now() is not monotonic [v3] Jaikiran Pai
  • Re: RFR: 8357539: TimeSource.now() is not monotonic [v3] Daniel Fuchs
  • Re: RFR: 8357539: TimeSource.now() is not monotonic [v3] Daniel Jeliński
  • Integrated: 8357539: TimeSource.now() is not monotonic Daniel Jeliński
• RFR: 8356893: Use "stdin.encoding" for reading System.in with InputStreamReader/Scanner Volkan Yazici
  • Re: RFR: 8356893: Use "stdin.encoding" for reading System.in with InputStreamReader/Scanner Roger Riggs
  • Re: RFR: 8356893: Use "stdin.encoding" for reading System.in with InputStreamReader/Scanner Volkan Yazici
  • Re: RFR: 8356893: Use "stdin.encoding" for reading System.in with InputStreamReader/Scanner Alan Bateman
  • Withdrawn: 8356893: Use "stdin.encoding" for reading System.in with InputStreamReader/Scanner Volkan Yazici
• RFR: 8357406: Remove usages of jdk.tracePinnedThreads system property from httpclient tests Jaikiran Pai
  • Re: RFR: 8357406: Remove usages of jdk.tracePinnedThreads system property from httpclient tests Volkan Yazici
  • Re: RFR: 8357406: Remove usages of jdk.tracePinnedThreads system property from httpclient tests Daniel Jeliński
  • Re: RFR: 8357406: Remove usages of jdk.tracePinnedThreads system property from httpclient tests Daniel Fuchs
  • Re: RFR: 8357406: Remove usages of jdk.tracePinnedThreads system property from httpclient tests SendaoYan
  • Integrated: 8357406: Remove usages of jdk.tracePinnedThreads system property from httpclient tests Jaikiran Pai
  • Re: RFR: 8357406: Remove usages of jdk.tracePinnedThreads system property from httpclient tests Jaikiran Pai
• Re: RFR: 8341346: Add support for exporting TLS Keying Material [v24] Bradford Wetmore
• Re: RFR: 8341346: Add support for exporting TLS Keying Material [v23] Bradford Wetmore
• Re: RFR: 8341346: Add support for exporting TLS Keying Material [v22] Bradford Wetmore
• Re: RFR: 8341346: Add support for exporting TLS Keying Material [v21] Bradford Wetmore
• RFR: 8304065: HttpServer.stop should terminate immediately if no exchanges are in progress Mikhail Yankelevich
  • Re: RFR: 8304065: HttpServer.stop should terminate immediately if no exchanges are in progress Daniel Fuchs
  • Re: RFR: 8304065: HttpServer.stop should terminate immediately if no exchanges are in progress Daniel Jeliński
  • Re: RFR: 8304065: HttpServer.stop should terminate immediately if no exchanges are in progress [v2] Mikhail Yankelevich
  • Re: RFR: 8304065: HttpServer.stop should terminate immediately if no exchanges are in progress Daniel Fuchs
  • Re: RFR: 8304065: HttpServer.stop should terminate immediately if no exchanges are in progress [v2] Mikhail Yankelevich
  • Re: RFR: 8304065: HttpServer.stop should terminate immediately if no exchanges are in progress Daniel Fuchs
  • Re: RFR: 8304065: HttpServer.stop should terminate immediately if no exchanges are in progress [v3] Mikhail Yankelevich
  • Re: RFR: 8304065: HttpServer.stop should terminate immediately if no exchanges are in progress Daniel Fuchs
  • Re: RFR: 8304065: HttpServer.stop should terminate immediately if no exchanges are in progress Daniel Jeliński
  • Re: RFR: 8304065: HttpServer.stop should terminate immediately if no exchanges are in progress [v2] Mikhail Yankelevich
  • Re: RFR: 8304065: HttpServer.stop should terminate immediately if no exchanges are in progress [v2] Mikhail Yankelevich
  • Re: RFR: 8304065: HttpServer.stop should terminate immediately if no exchanges are in progress [v3] Mikhail Yankelevich
  • Re: RFR: 8304065: HttpServer.stop should terminate immediately if no exchanges are in progress [v3] Daniel Fuchs
  • Re: RFR: 8304065: HttpServer.stop should terminate immediately if no exchanges are in progress [v4] Mikhail Yankelevich

• Earlier messages
• Later messages