>>>>> On Fri, 04 Jun 2004 09:43:54 +0100, Dave Shield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
Dave> You mean something like: Dave> config_belongs_in( MIBLIB ) Dave> vs Dave> config_belongs_in( AGENTLIB ) Dave> ?vs Dave> config_belongs_in( AGENT ) Something like that, yeah. Dave> and then use that to build the lists of object files in the various Dave> Makefiles? Yep. Dave> The main thing that springs to mind is a need to check that dependencies Dave> only run one way. I was mostly figuring it would be done by developers not end users. I'm not convinced a end-user should be moving stuff around (but a developer could certainly just twiddle the header if they wanted). >> it has its other advantages which you just put in my head Dave> Such as? too late. I already forgot. The biggest ones are the fact that its less maintence to change one line in a header than it is to move stuff around all the time. Plus it keeps the history in the right CVS root file as well. The agent library gets to be modular as much as possible as well, and supporting systems can be lumped in only if either a mib module needs them, or if the compiling-user actually requested it to be included anyway. Dave> C'mon Wes, you know that your head isn't a safe repository for anything Dave> important. At the very least share it with someone reliable like Katie. She would have certainly remembered. She has her mother's memory, fortunately. -- Wes Hardaker Sparta ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: GNOME Foundation Hackers Unite! GUADEC: The world's #1 Open Source Desktop Event. GNOME Users and Developers European Conference, 28-30th June in Norway http://2004/guadec.org _______________________________________________ Net-snmp-coders mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-coders
