I'm going over the patches&comments right now. I have reached this one yet, but that one is to circumvent a possible bug in FreeBSD where the first string into the sysctlbyname call is not treated as constant. And it disappears once the call has been issued 1 time. So the assignment to p, is just to save the address for the second call.
--WjW ----- Original Message ----- From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, June 24, 2004 10:01 PM Subject: Re: anybody using net-snmp on FreeBSD/AMD64 ( or other 64bit platforms??) > > 5. Question: when you apply the patch to mibII/ipv6.c, does this fix > > the "OID not increasing" bug 735912 ? > > Substitute 735912 with 502215, which is the bug I intended to refer to. > > Nonetheless, the above patch did not affect the bug 502215 > "oid not increasing" outcome that was seen by "snmpwalk". > > -Mike > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.Net email sponsored by Black Hat Briefings & Training. > Attend Black Hat Briefings & Training, Las Vegas July 24-29 - > digital self defense, top technical experts, no vendor pitches, > unmatched networking opportunities. Visit www.blackhat.com > _______________________________________________ > Net-snmp-coders mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-coders > > ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email sponsored by Black Hat Briefings & Training. Attend Black Hat Briefings & Training, Las Vegas July 24-29 - digital self defense, top technical experts, no vendor pitches, unmatched networking opportunities. Visit www.blackhat.com _______________________________________________ Net-snmp-coders mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-coders
