DS> So whatever approach we use, I'd suggest it's based on DS> the most recent release string from that line. DS> Are there any disagreements about that? RS> Yes, of course. ;-)
Grrr..... RS> Actually, for branches, I agree that (a) is reasonable. However, for main, RS> I like (b) better. eg, right now I see main as "what will be 5.2", RS> not "what was 5.1 + changes" (that would be v5-1-patches). OK - fair comment. I'm not totally happy with "5.2-less-a-bit" but you're correct that "5.1+changes" isn't right either. Ummm..... I think we need some input on this one.... Dave ---------------------------------------------------------------- This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program. ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email sponsored by Black Hat Briefings & Training. Attend Black Hat Briefings & Training, Las Vegas July 24-29 - digital self defense, top technical experts, no vendor pitches, unmatched networking opportunities. Visit www.blackhat.com _______________________________________________ Net-snmp-coders mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-coders
