Robert,
One important thing that I did forget to mention is that I made some changes. I meant to submit the patch before mailing to the list and had a bout of brain death. Patch [990550] should be applied anyway, because the compile did not even make it to the config_require errors without it. I have attached the patch, and I am still working on the MinGW errors. More as I learn more.
Andy
Robert Story (Coders) wrote:
On Thu, 08 Jul 2004 12:55:12 -0400 Andy wrote: AS> > Andy Smith wrote: AS> > Is that with the main branch? AS> AS> Yes, I should have specified that it is the main branch. Are the AS> config_require macros even supposed to be making it into the headers?
They are found in non-installed headers in the mibgroup tree. They shouldn't be in installed headers.
If you are having problems, I'm almost certainly to blame. What kind of problems are you having?
-- -------------------------- Andy Smith, MCP [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------
--- net-snmp/include/net-snmp/system/mingw32.h Tue Apr 20 14:09:47 2004
+++ net-snmp-mingw32/include/net-snmp/system/mingw32.h Wed Jul 7 12:01:41 2004
@@ -69,3 +69,8 @@
int tz_dsttime;
};
+/*
+ * Probably not good for 64 bit Windows. Borrowed from Linux.
+ */
+typedef unsigned int u_int32_t;
+typedef unsigned char u_int8_t;
