> The code I generated for ifXTable is by using the ucd-snmp style.
>
> Also, I gone through the code for ifXTable implementation in the repository.
> That code is generated using the new style i believe.
Yes.
All new development will use the v5 APIs. The v4-line is dead.
(There will probably be one final bug-fix release of 4.2.7,
but that will be the end).
> not even in the format of net-snmp 5.1.1 release. am i right?
Err... I'm not sure what you mean by this.
It uses a different style of helper, agreed.
You'd have to ask Robert about that - this is his baby....
> here is the exact code which I put inside this var_ifXTable using
> counter64 structure.
But you're *not* using a counter64 structure:
> ret_val = (char *) calloc(1, 21);
> uu_long = <something>;>
> /* storing it in a string format */
> sprintf(ret_val, "%lld", uu_long);
>
> /* return statement expecting string format */
> return (u_char *) ret_val;
You're using a string representation of a long format. That isn't
what the agent is expecting. It's expecting a "struct counter64"
(You're also failing to pass back the size of this result)
Try
c64.high = 0;
c64.low = 1;
*var_len = sizeof(struct counter64);
return (u_char *)&c64;
Dave
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by BEA Weblogic Workshop
FREE Java Enterprise J2EE developer tools!
Get your free copy of BEA WebLogic Workshop 8.1 today.
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=4721&alloc_id=10040&op=click
_______________________________________________
Net-snmp-coders mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-coders
