On Sat, 21 Aug 2004 01:03:21 +0100 Richard wrote: RM> I did a bit of investigation on the issue and came up with the following RM> patch. It uses the C99 macro SCNuMAX to get the appropriate scan RM> specifier for uintmax_t. How does that look?
I hadn't see that macro before. It is just what we need. The only problem is that the minimum entry level for compilers has always been ANSI C. I am not sure that bumping it up to C99 will go over very well. Checking a few of the sourceforge compile farms hosts reveal that neither FreeBSD or OpenBSD have SCNuMAX defined in <inttypes.h>. So instead of an out-and-out replacement, we need to break down and use an ifdef on __STDC_FORMAT_MACROS to add the new 64-bit compatabile definitions. That should not break ANSI systems, but work for newer systems too. Unless anyone has any better ideas? -- Robert Story; NET-SNMP Junkie <http://www.net-snmp.org/> <irc://irc.freenode.net/#net-snmp> Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum=net-snmp-coders> You are lost in a twisty maze of little standards, all different. ------------------------------------------------------- SF.Net email is sponsored by Shop4tech.com-Lowest price on Blank Media 100pk Sonic DVD-R 4x for only $29 -100pk Sonic DVD+R for only $33 Save 50% off Retail on Ink & Toner - Free Shipping and Free Gift. http://www.shop4tech.com/z/Inkjet_Cartridges/9_108_r285 _______________________________________________ Net-snmp-coders mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-coders
