On Wed, 13 Oct 2004 19:19:28 +0200 Hermann wrote: HL> > Once that works, I would look into moving packet decoding into the HL> > reception thread. I don't think it would warrant it's own thread, as I HL> > expect that the decoding of packets to be fairly quick. HL> HL> What do you mean with the decoding exactly?
The packet comes in as a chunk of bytes. Those bytes need to be decoded into the C structures. Pulling out the vabrinds, oids, etc. Also, SNMPv3 decrypting and authentication. -- Robert Story; NET-SNMP Junkie <http://www.net-snmp.org/> <irc://irc.freenode.net/#net-snmp> Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum=net-snmp-coders> You are lost in a twisty maze of little standards, all different. ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: IT Product Guide on ITManagersJournal Use IT products in your business? Tell us what you think of them. Give us Your Opinions, Get Free ThinkGeek Gift Certificates! Click to find out more http://productguide.itmanagersjournal.com/guidepromo.tmpl _______________________________________________ Net-snmp-coders mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-coders
