On Tue, 28 Sep 2004 11:41:06 -0400 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: SN> The sensors patch causes some concern, probably not suitable for us SN> 1. It modifies HOST-RESOURCES-MIBS -- did your team check with SN> the current author of this MIB to test the change's correctness? SN> The Net-SNMP project would be setting a bad example if it SN> incorporated an out-of-sync MIB.
I would have worded this a little stronger. It's not just an 'out-of-sync' issue. Changing the syntax of published mib objects violates the SNMP RFCs. I'm also guessing that get/set requests between a patches RedHat system and any stock net-snmp will result in bad type error messages. -- Robert Story; NET-SNMP Junkie <http://www.net-snmp.org/> <irc://irc.freenode.net/#net-snmp> Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum=net-snmp-coders> You are lost in a twisty maze of little standards, all different. ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: IT Product Guide on ITManagersJournal Use IT products in your business? Tell us what you think of them. Give us Your Opinions, Get Free ThinkGeek Gift Certificates! Click to find out more http://productguide.itmanagersjournal.com/guidepromo.tmpl _______________________________________________ Net-snmp-coders mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-coders
