On Tue, 5 Oct 2004 16:30:13 -0700 Steve wrote: SF> On Tue, Oct 05, 2004 at 07:09:55PM -0400, Robert Story wrote: SF> This smells like a bad idea. I can imagine all kinds of linker issues if SF> one of the functions is required by the platform [...]
The code already exists, in their own files. All I proposing is to merge the little files into one. SF> Are you proposing putting #ifdefs around all the functions in questions SF> to be guided by ./configure? They all already have ifdefs and configure tests. -- Robert Story; NET-SNMP Junkie <http://www.net-snmp.org/> <irc://irc.freenode.net/#net-snmp> Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum=net-snmp-coders> You are lost in a twisty maze of little standards, all different. ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: IT Product Guide on ITManagersJournal Use IT products in your business? Tell us what you think of them. Give us Your Opinions, Get Free ThinkGeek Gift Certificates! Click to find out more http://productguide.itmanagersjournal.com/guidepromo.tmpl _______________________________________________ Net-snmp-coders mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-coders
