On Thu, 24 Mar 2005 09:45:29 -0600 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
EYC> I sent out an email a week ago which I wish could get some feedback.
EYC> Continuing my research, I found in RFC2741 an Example which is exactly
EYC> what I want to do to avoid conflict of ifTable between master agent and my
EYC> subagent.
 [...]
EYC> Would you give me some advise on how this subagent should register or
EYC> allocate a single row of ifTable? Thank you very much.

This is exactly the right idea. Unfortunately, it still might not work. The
problem is that the existing ifTable doesn't use this method of allocating
indexes, so there could potentially be an overlap.

If the system comes up and interfaces don't come and go, then it's likely that
a conflict will never occur, but it is still a possibility.

I've never tried the index allocation stuff, or registering a row, but I think
it has been discussed on the mailing list in the past. Have you tried searching
the archives?

-- 
Robert Story; NET-SNMP Junkie
Support: <http://www.net-snmp.org/> <irc://irc.freenode.net/#net-snmp>
Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum=net-snmp-coders>

You are lost in a twisty maze of little standards, all different. 


-------------------------------------------------------
SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide
Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users.
Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now.
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6595&alloc_id=14396&op=click
_______________________________________________
Net-snmp-coders mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-coders

Reply via email to