On Mon, 11 Apr 2005 16:44:13 -0700 Wes wrote:
WH> 1) has any mib2c.conf file produced code that used the API that
WH> someone may have twiddled with, or is it something they had to
WH> intentionally use?
They would have had to intentionally use it.
WH> 2) does the current API allow for negative numbers in the API, or is
WH> unsigned currently? I don't see a problem with negative numbers.
WH> negative numbers for priority levels are actually quiet common in
WH> API sets. unix-nice, iptables, etc all have negative numbers for
WH> priority levels and it's common.
It is an integer, so it would allow negative numbers. If it's common, then that
might be an argument for just leaving it as is.
--
NOTE: messages sent directly to me, instead of the lists, will be deleted
unless they are requests for paid consulting services.
Robert Story; NET-SNMP Junkie
Support: <http://www.net-snmp.org/> <irc://irc.freenode.net/#net-snmp>
Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum=net-snmp-coders>
You are lost in a twisty maze of little standards, all different.
-------------------------------------------------------
SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide
Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users.
Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now.
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6595&alloc_id=14396&op=click
_______________________________________________
Net-snmp-coders mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-coders
