>>>>> On Wed, 22 Jun 2005 09:40:06 -0400, Robert Story <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
Robert> Hmm.. I guess that would be Wes, who hasn't spoken up. He'd Robert> better speak up soon, or the 5.1.3 release engineer will make Robert> an executive decision. Robert> Anyone else care to weigh in on the issue? (particularly core Robert> developers) Err... That's actually Robert! He's been the 5.1 line for ages. It's 5.2 that has a big ??? next to it (and thus will likely end up me). It doesn't really ring of a bug fix to me. It's sort of in between, which is why it's hard. The bug is small, can easily be worked around by a decent sysadmin and is not likely to be hit. But the fix is fairly large (I think) and more complex, and the 5.1 line is really kinda stable at this point... I'd probably lean just barely against it. Feel free to ignore my opinion. -- Wes Hardaker Sparta, Inc. ------------------------------------------------------- SF.Net email is sponsored by: Discover Easy Linux Migration Strategies from IBM. Find simple to follow Roadmaps, straightforward articles, informative Webcasts and more! Get everything you need to get up to speed, fast. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7477&alloc_id=16492&op=click _______________________________________________ Net-snmp-coders mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-coders
