>>>>> On Wed, 31 Aug 2005 09:45:59 +0200, Thomas Anders <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
>>>>> said:

Thomas> Wes Hardaker wrote:
>>>>>>> On Tue, 30 Aug 2005 00:27:36 +0200, Thomas Anders <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
>>>>>>> said:
Thomas> NETSNMP_DS_LIB_DONT_PERSIST_STATE (a 3-in-1 for the above)
>> hasn't been Thomas> touched yet and still needs a better name
>> (IMHO). Further suggestions?
>> The name is bound, unfortunately, by publication already...  Aliasing
>> would be the only option if you wanted to rename it.

Thomas> Sure, that's how it was discussed in this thread. As you
Thomas> proposed the other new names: do you care to propose a new
Thomas> alias name for NETSNMP_DS_LIB_DONT_PERSIST_STATE, too?
Thomas> (Proposals from the rest of the crowd probably accepted, too
Thomas> ;-).)

Err...  um....  no?

NETSNMP_DS_LIB_DONT_USE_PERSIST_STATE ?

-- 
Wes Hardaker
Sparta, Inc.


-------------------------------------------------------
SF.Net email is Sponsored by the Better Software Conference & EXPO
September 19-22, 2005 * San Francisco, CA * Development Lifecycle Practices
Agile & Plan-Driven Development * Managing Projects & Teams * Testing & QA
Security * Process Improvement & Measurement * http://www.sqe.com/bsce5sf
_______________________________________________
Net-snmp-coders mailing list
Net-snmp-coders@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-coders

Reply via email to