Wes> I certainly don't mind it replacing, eventually, the existing code as
Wes> long as:
Wes> 1) it's backwards compatible if it's reasonable to do so
Naturally. That's a given.
Wes> Mostly this should effect just the monitor token.
Yup. That one's already mostly in place (but extended). It's the
other tokens (defaultMonitors, etc) that still need to be added.
Wes> 2) It truly does implement everything that is there now, which I don't
Wes> think it does. You said it does,
<sigh>
No - I said:
Dave> This implementation isn't fully complete....
Dave> .... But it should be sufficiently operational
Dave> to be able to compare it sensibly against the existing code.
^^^^^^^
It's not ready to replace your code yet, but there's enough to get a
feeling for the two. You've often whinged at me for holding back and
submitting everything in one go - you keep trying to encourage me to
submit early and often. Now maybe you see why I tend not to!
Dave
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by:
Power Architecture Resource Center: Free content, downloads, discussions,
and more. http://solutions.newsforge.com/ibmarch.tmpl
_______________________________________________
Net-snmp-coders mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-coders
