On Fri, 30 Sep 2005 11:43:43 -0400 shuki wrote:
SS> I have tried to look at things with a debugger and:
SS>
SS> a.) The ifEntry handler is not called for a GET it is called for a GETNEXT.
When you are dealing with the indexes yourself, you have to deal with the GET
and GETNEXT case. We can only do the GETNEXT to GET mapping if we know the
indexes, and you are explicity trying to deal with the indexes yourself.
SS> What I see using a debugger is that table_info->number_indexes is always
SS> zero.
Which is what it should be for a request from snmpwalk. You need to find the
'next' index, fix up the OID and process the request.
--
NOTE: messages sent directly to me, instead of the lists, will be deleted
unless they are requests for paid consulting services.
Robert Story; NET-SNMP Junkie
Support: <http://www.net-snmp.org/> <irc://irc.freenode.net/#net-snmp>
Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum=net-snmp-coders>
You are lost in a twisty maze of little standards, all different.
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by:
Power Architecture Resource Center: Free content, downloads, discussions,
and more. http://solutions.newsforge.com/ibmarch.tmpl
_______________________________________________
Net-snmp-coders mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-coders
