On Tue, 15 Nov 2005 10:15:20 -0800 Fong wrote:
FT> RS> I'm guessing there is another leak in 5.0.9 that has been fixed in
FT> 5.0.10.x
FT> RS> that you need to back-port.
FT>
FT> Do you mean line: 5327 SNMP_FREE(isp->packet) in snmp_api.c (v5.0.10.2)?
FT> That part seems correct since when NETSNMP_TRANSPORT_FLAG_STREAM, it
FT> does store the packets in isp->packet.
I'm not sure what need to be backported. All I'm saying is that running udpsic
against a 5.0.10.2 agent did not leak on my machine. If you can get 5.0.10.2
to leak, then we can try and find a fix, but we don't have the resources to
fix problems in old releases with back-ported fixes.
--
NOTE: messages sent directly to me, instead of the lists, will be deleted
unless they are requests for paid consulting services.
Robert Story; NET-SNMP Junkie
Support: <http://www.net-snmp.org/> <irc://irc.freenode.net/#net-snmp>
Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum=net-snmp-coders>
You are lost in a twisty maze of little standards, all different.
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by the JBoss Inc. Get Certified Today
Register for a JBoss Training Course. Free Certification Exam
for All Training Attendees Through End of 2005. For more info visit:
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7628&alloc_id=16845&op=click
_______________________________________________
Net-snmp-coders mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-coders
