On Wed, Nov 30, 2005 at 10:30:30AM +0000, Dave Shield wrote: > On Tue, 2005-11-29 at 18:26 +0000, Patrick Welche wrote: > > TEXTUAL-CONVENTION MACRO (lines 8..48 parsed and ignored). > > I'd be tempted to simply comment out these particular macro. > definitions, since they're hardcoded into the MIB parser, and
Rather, that message should be removed from the parser, as it is more of a debugging message, than a warning. There is nothing wrong with the MIB or the processing of it. > we've already tweaked these two MIB files anyway. No, all the MIBS that we distribute are straight from the RFC document, extracted by the scripts in the mibs directory. Nothing has been tweaked. /Niels -- Niels Baggesen -- @home -- Århus -- Denmark -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] The purpose of computing is insight, not numbers -- R W Hamming ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files for problems? Stop! Download the new AJAX search engine that makes searching your log files as easy as surfing the web. DOWNLOAD SPLUNK! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_idv37&alloc_id865&op=click _______________________________________________ Net-snmp-coders mailing list Net-snmp-coders@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-coders
