On Tue, 27 Dec 2005 12:03:06 +0000 Sridhar wrote:
SA> I sent the mail a little too soon... The problem is netsnmp_daemonize
SA> is returning with error. This is the issue with the fork. Is there
SA> a patch available for uClinux replacing this with vfork().
Why is vfork needed? The man pages I checked (Linux, OpenBSD) indicate that
fork has improved to the point that vfork is no longer needed.
--
NOTE: messages sent directly to me, instead of the lists, will be deleted
unless they are requests for paid consulting services.
Robert Story; NET-SNMP Junkie
Support: <http://www.net-snmp.org/> <irc://irc.freenode.net/#net-snmp>
Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum=net-snmp-coders>
You are lost in a twisty maze of little standards, all different.
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files
for problems? Stop! Download the new AJAX search engine that makes
searching your log files as easy as surfing the web. DOWNLOAD SPLUNK!
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7637&alloc_id=16865&op=click
_______________________________________________
Net-snmp-coders mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-coders
