On Wed, 9 Aug 2006 15:11:52 +0000 Claus wrote: CK> On Wednesday 09 August 2006 14:27, Robert Story wrote: CK> > On Wed, 9 Aug 2006 13:06:25 +0000 Claus wrote: CK> > CK> IF-MIB::ifDescr[7] = STRING: br0 CK> > CK> IF-MIB::ifDescr[501] = STRING: nas0 <<<<<<<<<< CK> > CK> FAULT position! ck IF-MIB::ifDescr[50] = STRING: STM-1 Physical CK> > CK> IF-MIB::ifDescr[51] = STRING: STM-1 Physical CK> > CK> > Does this happen during a normal walk as well? CK> CK> No, only the first nas interface is at the wrong possition.
Hmmm.. That doesn't make any sense. I can see the errors in the get-bulk, but not a normal snmpwalk, unless it went into a loop at 501 (back to 51 again). I don't understand how in a snmp get-next request (which is what snmpwalk uses) can go from 501 to 51 in one case, but later on go from 501 to 502. try these 2 commands (w/appropriate parameters): snmpgetnext ifDescr.7 (should return ifDescr.51) snmpgetnext ifDescr.501 (should return ifDescr.502) If those 2 get those results, I wouldn't expect _any_ duplicated in a normal snmpwalk. At any rate, it's obviously a bug. Please file a bug report with all the info you've provided so far... ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642 _______________________________________________ Net-snmp-coders mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-coders
