Wes Hardaker wrote: >>>>>> "DS" == Dave Shield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > DS> Ummm... how about something similar to > DS> http://www.redhat.com/archives/rpm-list/2001-August/msg00072.html > > DS> Not sure about the licensing implications of using either this or > DS> the Mozilla equivalent > > Well, the mozilla license is different than ours and I don't really > like the idea of legally merging them because IANAL.
So if we're not picking up someone else's va_copy() magic, what else can we do? Choices: 1) come up with our own va_copy() magic (configure test and replacement) 2) rewrite the patch that introduced va_copy to work without it 3) backout the patch (which fixed a potential crash) 4) do nothing (i.e. building MAIN will continue to fail on a fair number of platforms) Thoughts? +Thomas -- Thomas Anders (thomas.anders at blue-cable.de) ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642 _______________________________________________ Net-snmp-coders mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-coders
