>>>>> "TA" == Thomas Anders <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

TA> It may break packaging for those who forcibly run "autoconf" when
TA> building (and only very few systems already ship 2.61). OTOH, it
TA> may make life easier for core developers. I'd propose to update
TA> MAIN first and see how it goes.

If they're forcing autoconf then they can also apply a patch that
removes the one line version requirement check.

I'm *not* proposing that we use the newer autoconf features in older
branch configure.in files.  I'm proposing that we build the configure
that gets released with the newest.
-- 
Wes Hardaker
Sparta, Inc.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
_______________________________________________
Net-snmp-coders mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-coders

Reply via email to