>>>>> "MF" == Magnus Fromreide <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
MF> I am certain that there is some good reason and hope somebody MF> could tell me, but why is the AgentX master module initiated by a MF> separate call to real_init_agentx in snmp_agent.c? Yes there is. Now if only we could remember it. We can certainly wish it was commented as to why. We could certainly have our wishes unfulfilled. I do remember discussing it "way back when" though. MF> Or, expressed in another way, why is the below patch a bad idea? Have you tried it? With various types of config? MF> * Move the master agent code from libnetsnmpagent to MF> libnetsnmpmibs That, however, seems like a different question. Why is it in the mib code? cause it isn't a mib implementation and is part of the agent, really... Regardless of where it is called in the init process, I still think it should be in libnetsnmpagent? MF> (Known drawbacks, the patch is a work in progress: MF> * It will reparse the agentx config, possily it should handle MF> duplicates there better) Sounds inefficient. What's the end goal, just out of curiosity? General clean up or some other problem? -- Wes Hardaker Sparta, Inc. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV _______________________________________________ Net-snmp-coders mailing list Net-snmp-coders@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-coders
