Hi Robert, You are right. After 1000 traps I am not seeing any memory leaks. Is there any document where I can get this kind of informations?
Thanks a lot for pointing out this!!! On Fri, 2007-06-01 at 10:27 -0400, Robert Story wrote: > On Thu, 24 May 2007 14:44:23 -0700 Navaneetham wrote: > N> You are right. The bug is not explaining when that issue was happening. > N> Any idea, any one is working on this memory leak issue? > > One thing to note is that the notification log mib keeps the most recent 1000 > traps in memory. So there is a normal, non-leaking increase of memory as that > table fills up. But leaks after the first 1000 traps are possible.. -- Regards, -Navaneetham ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now. http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/ _______________________________________________ Net-snmp-coders mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-coders
