>>>>> "NS" == Nathan Schrenk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
NS> Is there any work planned to fix either of these problems? If not, NS> if I were to modify the library to throw exceptions from the NS> snmpget, snmpwalk, etc, functions when they encountered errors and NS> submit a patch, would the NET-SNMP developers have any objection in NS> principle to that type of change? We'd have to review the changes, of course, but improvements to the module would be highly appreciated. The original work was based on work done for "Science Logic" as they needed a faster SNMP implementation so a C binding made since (and apparently did have a big speed improvement). But, as far as I know, no one is actively working on improving the binding right now so someone actively working on it would certainly be a good thing. Submit any patches you make to: http://www.net-snmp.org/patches/ -- Wes Hardaker Sparta, Inc. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ _______________________________________________ Net-snmp-coders mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-coders
