Hi Dave,
Thanks for your reply.
Te handler routine lookslike following:
/** handles requests for the xDSLATMConfProfileTable table, if anything else
needs to be done */
int
xDSLATMConfProfileTable_handler(
netsnmp_mib_handler *handler,
netsnmp_handler_registration *reginfo,
netsnmp_agent_request_info *reqinfo,
netsnmp_request_info *requests) {
netsnmp_request_info *request;
netsnmp_table_request_info *table_info;
netsnmp_variable_list *var;
struct commitInfo *ci = NULL;
void *data_context = NULL;
oid *suffix;
size_t suffix_len;
/** column and row index encoded portion */
suffix = requests->requestvb->name + reginfo->rootoid_len + 1;
suffix_len = requests->requestvb->name_length -
(reginfo->rootoid_len + 1);
for(request = requests; request; request = request->next) {
var = request->requestvb;
if (request->processed != 0)
continue;
switch (reqinfo->mode) {
case MODE_GET:
case MODE_SET_RESERVE1:
data_context = netsnmp_extract_iterator_context(request);
if (data_context == NULL) {
if (reqinfo->mode == MODE_GET) {
netsnmp_set_request_error(reqinfo, request,
SNMP_NOSUCHINSTANCE);
continue;
}
}
break;
default: /* == the other SET modes */
ci = netsnmp_oid_stash_get_data(commitStorage,
suffix+1, suffix_len-1);
break;
}
/** extracts the information about the table from the request */
table_info = netsnmp_extract_table_info(request);
/** table_info->colnum contains the column number requested */
/** table_info->indexes contains a linked list of snmp variable
bindings for the indexes of the table. Values in the list
have been set corresponding to the indexes of the
request */
if (table_info == NULL) {
continue;
}
switch(reqinfo->mode) {
case MODE_GET:
switch(table_info->colnum) {
case COLUMN_XDSLATMCHCONFPROFIMAENABLED:
{
long *retval;
size_t retval_len = 0;
retval =
get_xDSLATMChConfProfImaEnabled(data_context, &retval_len);
snmp_set_var_typed_value(var, ASN_INTEGER,
(const u_char *)
retval,
retval_len);
}
break;
[snip]
So in your opinion, there may be a bug in the old version?
Trying to upgrade agent code or the template will be helpful?
Thanks,
永鈦鑫 iTAS Corporation
新竹市水源街75號
NO. 75,Shuiyuan St., Hsinchu City, Taiwan, R.O.C.
Tel:03-5716099 Ext.1208
E-mail:[email protected]
----- Original Message -----
From: "Dave Shield" <[email protected]>
To: "Tewen Hsieh" <[email protected]>
Cc: <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, August 18, 2009 3:26 PM
Subject: Re: Could anyone give me some suggestions?
> 2009/8/18 Tewen Hsieh <[email protected]>:
>> I am working with template code which was generated from
>> mib2c.iterate_access.conf.
>> Because of performance issue, I get the external data(PHY register
>> values)
>> in each column's get_ routine like following:
>
> [snip]
>
> Yes. And what does the handler routine look like?
> I.e. the code where these get_xxx calls are actually used?
>
>
>> Is there anything wrong in my get_ routine?
>> Or it's a net-snmp 5.1.1's bug?
>
> That's probably the problem, then.
> The 5.1.x line is very *very* old, and the mib2c templates
> (along with everything else) have been significantly
> improved since then.
> In particular, there are no checks on the return value
> of the 'get_xxx' routines.
>
> Try using a less obsolete version of the code.
> (Or at the very least, a newer version of the mib2c template)
>
> Dave
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day
trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus on
what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with
Crystal Reports now. http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july
_______________________________________________
Net-snmp-coders mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-coders
