On Sun, 2010-05-23 at 21:14 -0700, Steve Friedl wrote:
> On Mon, May 24, 2010 at 07:11:02AM +0300, Omer Zak wrote:
> > 2. Is anyone else in favor of forking the Net-SNMP project over the
> > comments issue?
>
> Forking a major project over *comments*?
Yes.
The comments situation in Net-SNMP is grave.
I already wasted lot of time trying to understand Net-SNMP agent code
due to insufficient comments.
--- Omer
--
Philip Machanick: "caution: if you write code like this, immediately
after you are fired the person assigned to maintaining your code after
you leave will resign"
My own blog is at http://www.zak.co.il/tddpirate/
My opinions, as expressed in this E-mail message, are mine alone.
They do not represent the official policy of any organization with which
I may be affiliated in any way.
WARNING TO SPAMMERS: at http://www.zak.co.il/spamwarning.html
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Net-snmp-coders mailing list
Net-snmp-coders@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-coders
