On 27 July 2010 07:46, Wes Hardaker <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>> On Mon, 26 Jul 2010 09:32:18 +0100, Dave Shield >>>>>> <[email protected]> said: > > DS> c) Use separate config tokens for these two approaches > DS> (e.g. "include"/"includefile", or "includeconf"/"include") > > DS> Thoughts? Preferences? > > How about "includeFile" and "includeAny"?
But your preference would be for distinct config tokens for these two cases, rather than a single shared directive? Does anyone else have any thoughts on the matter? Dave ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ The Palm PDK Hot Apps Program offers developers who use the Plug-In Development Kit to bring their C/C++ apps to Palm for a share of $1 Million in cash or HP Products. Visit us here for more details: http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;226879339;13503038;l? http://clk.atdmt.com/CRS/go/247765532/direct/01/ _______________________________________________ Net-snmp-coders mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-coders
