On 6 October 2010 14:16, Wes Hardaker <harda...@users.sourceforge.net> wrote: > DS> - We were talking about having some form of (optional) > DS> automatic build report emailed to us, .... > DS> Did anything ever come of this? > > No, not yet. And it's to late to start on it for 5.6, unfortunately.
Sure - I certainly wasn't thinking in terms of the 5.6 release now. But it's probably worth trying to get something basic into the trunk code, as soon as possible after 5.6 is out. > In this case, the change to configure *only* affects people that have > tried to enable v6..... > (the whole section of code is within 'test "x$enable_ipv6" = "xyes"') Our *expectation* is that the change to configure *should* only affect people that have tried to enable v6.... But remember that the purpose of the "rcN(max) == final" requirement was to protect against the introduction of accidental changes. Going straight to final now means foregoing this protection. That may well be a risk worth taking, but it *is* a risk (however minimal). But we can discuss this properly next week. Dave ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Beautiful is writing same markup. Internet Explorer 9 supports standards for HTML5, CSS3, SVG 1.1, ECMAScript5, and DOM L2 & L3. Spend less time writing and rewriting code and more time creating great experiences on the web. Be a part of the beta today. http://p.sf.net/sfu/beautyoftheweb _______________________________________________ Net-snmp-coders mailing list Net-snmp-coders@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-coders
