On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 09:12:11AM -0800, Wes Hardaker wrote: > >>>>> On Thu, 10 Feb 2011 16:56:39 +0000, Dave Shield > >>>>> <d.t.shi...@liverpool.ac.uk> said: > > DS> Wes - is it worth trying to catch SIGQUIT, > DS> and handling this in a similar way to SIGINT. > > I don't think you can do that.
It's certainly possible to catch SIGQUIT, but since this is how people generate a core dump for debugging, it would interfere with somebody trying to get an agent working (though certainly not the most common case). Steve -- Stephen J Friedl | Security Consultant | UNIX Wizard | 714 694-0494 st...@unixwiz.net | Orange County, CA | Microsoft MVP | unixwiz.net ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ The ultimate all-in-one performance toolkit: Intel(R) Parallel Studio XE: Pinpoint memory and threading errors before they happen. Find and fix more than 250 security defects in the development cycle. Locate bottlenecks in serial and parallel code that limit performance. http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-dev2devfeb _______________________________________________ Net-snmp-coders mailing list Net-snmp-coders@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-coders
