On Sun, 2011-03-27 at 10:02 +0200, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 27, 2011 at 8:28 AM, Magnus Fromreide
> <[email protected]> wrote:
...
>         The ABI effect. Should the symbols be present in the library
>         or not?
> 
> Shouldn't <net-snmp/net-snmp-features.h> be considered as part of the
> ABI ? I think it should be installed too.

I do not know. Either it should be and then obviously be installed but
that would make all the generated symbols public or it shouldn't be and
in that case it shouldn't be installed nor included in any header.

I have to say that this thing is starting to get to configurable.

/MF



------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Enable your software for Intel(R) Active Management Technology to meet the
growing manageability and security demands of your customers. Businesses
are taking advantage of Intel(R) vPro (TM) technology - will your software 
be a part of the solution? Download the Intel(R) Manageability Checker 
today! http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-dev2devmar
_______________________________________________
Net-snmp-coders mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-coders

Reply via email to