On 12 May 2011 14:35, Wes Hardaker <[email protected]> wrote: > WH> 2) Change the u_int32 back to u_long, and *fix the broken code*. > WH> (IE, If printing doesn't work that can be fixed) > > WH> A) produce 5.6.1.1 immediately > > I think that needs to be done
I don't really like that solution. But on due consideration, I like the alternatives even less. So yes - I think we probably should release 5.6.1.1 to revert this change. Next question: should 5.6.1.1 contain *just* this reversion or should it contain other changes on the 5.6.x branch? > (and fedora patched immediately for updates). That's really a decision for the Fedora packagers, not us. Dave ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Achieve unprecedented app performance and reliability What every C/C++ and Fortran developer should know. Learn how Intel has extended the reach of its next-generation tools to help boost performance applications - inlcuding clusters. http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-dev2devmay _______________________________________________ Net-snmp-coders mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-coders
