>>>>> On Thu, 16 Jun 2011 13:04:44 +0200, Leo Cacciari <leo.cacci...@gmail.com> >>>>> said:
LC> As I can not think that this was simply overlooked, I'm wondering LC> why (special opaque) types as Integer64 or Double are nowhere LC> defined. Could be that I'm simply missing the definition? Or should LC> they be added to NET-SNMP-TC MIB? There was a project a long time ago that I and David Perkins were working on where most of this work came from. We had the definitions in a separate MIB if I recall (I need to go find the files; it was over a decade ago). It'd be worth moving them into the base TC MIB, I agree. BTW, the IETF is currently defining TCs for things like floats now based on an octet string rather than opaques. See draft-ietf-opsawg-mib-floats-02.txt for details. -- Wes Hardaker Please mail all replies to net-snmp-coders@lists.sourceforge.net ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ EditLive Enterprise is the world's most technically advanced content authoring tool. Experience the power of Track Changes, Inline Image Editing and ensure content is compliant with Accessibility Checking. http://p.sf.net/sfu/ephox-dev2dev _______________________________________________ Net-snmp-coders mailing list Net-snmp-coders@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-coders
