As such, you should post your question and WAIT for an answer.
Nagging us for an immediate response is unlikely to be popular or effective.
I do not have any thing to say but, I will keep this in mind.
Though personally, if you're using a cache-based approach,
then I can't see the point of working with the iterators at all.
It's one of the less efficient implementation approaches.
You're loading all of the entries into the agent anyway - why
not hold them in a way that they can be accessed directly?
That's the purpose of the table_tdata framework, which
would be my personal helper-of-choice for most cases.
Dave
I see your point . I do not think any performance/efficiency issue on small
table . Though I understand it is traversing the linked list.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
EMC VNX: the world's simplest storage, starting under $10K
The only unified storage solution that offers unified management
Up to 160% more powerful than alternatives and 25% more efficient.
Guaranteed. http://p.sf.net/sfu/emc-vnx-dev2dev
_______________________________________________
Net-snmp-coders mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-coders
