On 19 July 2012 11:08, <[email protected]> wrote: > I have an application which worked perfectly in SNMpv3 in AuthnoPriv mode. > There is a requirement like a “context name” is to be added to the snmp > requests which is sent by the application.
> I have only one snmpd server which sends responses back to this application. > If the application fills the context name in the PDU, it is not receiving > any response from snmpd. What changes have you made to the access control settings on the agent to take account of this new context? > How can I properly configure the context name on the server side? See the section covering "rouser" and "rwuser" in the snmpd.conf(5) man page - this comes in the section headed "Traditional Access Control" (or the description of "access" in the section "VACM Configuration" if you're using that appriach. > Do a different server is required to handle the packets? No. > Is there any more configuration needed on the server side to make it work? Yes - see above. Dave ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Live Security Virtual Conference Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/ _______________________________________________ Net-snmp-coders mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-coders
