Dear All,
 
By studying and testing SNMP performance these days, I found that X-agent is 
not efficient as I expected:
SNMP sub-agent mode slows down the total time of getbulk, by change the SNMP 
agent architecture from master and sub-agent to only one agent, the performance 
improves dramatically.
See below for some test result, with sub-agent, the getbulk time is 
approximately 3 times than the time without sub-agent.

--------------------------------------------------------
 Table                  No SubAgent     with Sub Agent
--------------------------------------------------------
16oid, 18 rows          4s              13s
5 oid, 500 rows         38s             140s
70 oid, 70 rows         35s             152s
---------------------------------------------------------

Don’t know if anyone has same puzzle, is there anything wrong here?

I paste the config file:
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
# SNMP master agent configuration file template
# defines a list of listening addresses, on which to receive incoming SNMP 
requests
agentaddress 54321
# enable the AgentX functionality and cause the agent to start listening for 
incoming AgentX registrations
master  agentx
# defines the address the master agent listens at, or the subagent should 
connect to 
agentxSocket localhost:705
# defines the timeout period (NUM seconds) for an AgentX request
agentXTimeout 5
# define engine ID for version3
engineIDType 1
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~


Thanks,
Barclay


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
LogMeIn Rescue: Anywhere, Anytime Remote support for IT. Free Trial
Remotely access PCs and mobile devices and provide instant support
Improve your efficiency, and focus on delivering more value-add services
Discover what IT Professionals Know. Rescue delivers
http://p.sf.net/sfu/logmein_12329d2d
_______________________________________________
Net-snmp-coders mailing list
Net-snmp-coders@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-coders

Reply via email to