Hi,

This is the test result. Please advise.

root@localhost:/etc/snmp> snmpset -v2c -c NETMAN 127.0.0.1 
.1.3.6.1.6.3.12.1.2.1.9.0.25 i 5
SNMP-TARGET-MIB::snmpTargetAddrRowStatus.'..' = INTEGER: createAndWait(5)
root@localhost:/etc/snmp> snmpset -v2c -c NETMAN 127.0.0.1 
.1.3.6.1.6.3.12.1.2.1.9.0.25.1 i 5
SNMP-TARGET-MIB::snmpTargetAddrRowStatus.'...' = INTEGER: createAndWait(5)
root@localhost:/etc/snmp> snmpset -v2c -c NETMAN 127.0.0.1 
.1.3.6.1.6.3.12.1.2.1.9.0.25.1.1 i 5
SNMP-TARGET-MIB::snmpTargetAddrRowStatus.'....' = INTEGER: createAndWait(5)
root@localhost:/etc/snmp> snmpset -v2c -c NETMAN 127.0.0.1 
.1.3.6.1.6.3.12.1.2.1.9.0.25.1.1.1 i 5
SNMP-TARGET-MIB::snmpTargetAddrRowStatus.'.....' = INTEGER: createAndWait(5)
root@localhost:/etc/snmp> snmpset -v2c -c NETMAN 127.0.0.1 
.1.3.6.1.6.3.12.1.2.1.9.1.25.1.1.1 i 5
SNMP-TARGET-MIB::snmpTargetAddrRowStatus.'.....' = INTEGER: createAndWait(5)
root@localhost:/etc/snmp> snmpset -v2c -c NETMAN 127.0.0.1 
.1.3.6.1.6.3.12.1.2.1.9.1.25.1.1 i 5
SNMP-TARGET-MIB::snmpTargetAddrRowStatus.'....' = INTEGER: createAndWait(5)
root@localhost:/etc/snmp> snmpset -v2c -c NETMAN 127.0.0.1 
.1.3.6.1.6.3.12.1.2.1.9.1.25.1 i 5
SNMP-TARGET-MIB::snmpTargetAddrRowStatus.'...' = INTEGER: createAndWait(5)
root@localhost:/etc/snmp> snmpset -v2c -c NETMAN 127.0.0.1 
.1.3.6.1.6.3.12.1.2.1.9.1.25 i 5
SNMP-TARGET-MIB::snmpTargetAddrRowStatus.'..' = INTEGER: createAndWait(5)
root@localhost:/etc/snmp> snmpset -v2c -c NETMAN 127.0.0.1 
.1.3.6.1.6.3.12.1.2.1.9.1.26 i 5
SNMP-TARGET-MIB::snmpTargetAddrRowStatus.'..' = INTEGER: createAndWait(5)
root@localhost:/etc/snmp> snmpset -v2c -c NETMAN 127.0.0.1 
.1.3.6.1.6.3.12.1.2.1.9.1.27 i 5
SNMP-TARGET-MIB::snmpTargetAddrRowStatus.'..' = INTEGER: createAndWait(5)
root@localhost:/etc/snmp> snmpset -v2c -c NETMAN 127.0.0.1 
.1.3.6.1.6.3.12.1.2.1.9.6.2 i 5
SNMP-TARGET-MIB::snmpTargetAddrRowStatus.'..' = INTEGER: createAndWait(5)
root@localhost:/etc/snmp> snmpwalk -v2c -c NETMAN 127.0.0.1 
.1.3.6.1.6.3.12.1.2.1.9 -Ofn
.1.3.6.1.6.3.12.1.2.1.9.0.25 = INTEGER: notReady(3)
.1.3.6.1.6.3.12.1.2.1.9.0.25.1 = INTEGER: notReady(3)
.1.3.6.1.6.3.12.1.2.1.9.0.25.1.1 = INTEGER: notReady(3)
.1.3.6.1.6.3.12.1.2.1.9.0.25.1.1.1 = INTEGER: notReady(3)
.1.3.6.1.6.3.12.1.2.1.9.1.25 = INTEGER: notReady(3)
.1.3.6.1.6.3.12.1.2.1.9.1.25.1 = INTEGER: notReady(3)
.1.3.6.1.6.3.12.1.2.1.9.1.25.1.1 = INTEGER: notReady(3)
.1.3.6.1.6.3.12.1.2.1.9.1.25.1.1.1 = INTEGER: notReady(3)
.1.3.6.1.6.3.12.1.2.1.9.1.26 = INTEGER: notReady(3)
.1.3.6.1.6.3.12.1.2.1.9.1.27 = INTEGER: notReady(3)
.1.3.6.1.6.3.12.1.2.1.9.6.2 = INTEGER: notReady(3)

Best Regards!
zhuyj

On 07/17/2013 10:23 AM, zhuyj wrote:
> Any advice?
>
> On 07/16/2013 04:49 PM, zhuyj wrote:
>> Hi, Magnus
>>
>> Based on your patch, I made a new patch. This patch depends on 
>> net-snmp5.7.2.
>> I made the following modifications compared with your patch:
>> 1.add strdup2 to replace strdup;
>> 2.modify addToList function;
>> 3.change some NUL-terminated strings to counted-strings, but not all;
>>
>> The patch is in the attachment. Please check it.
>>
>> Best Regards!
>> zhuyj
>> On 07/16/2013 02:14 PM, Magnus Fromreide wrote:
>>> On Tue, 2013-07-16 at 10:27 +0800, zhuyj wrote:
>>>> Thanks for your help!
>>>> I agree with you. It is a big task to replace all the NUL-terminated
>>>> string with counted-string.
>>>> Now I have a patch that can fix this. Would you like to merge this
>>>> patch in master of net-snmp?
>>> If you send out the patch then I will look at it.
>>>
>>> /MF
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>
>


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
See everything from the browser to the database with AppDynamics
Get end-to-end visibility with application monitoring from AppDynamics
Isolate bottlenecks and diagnose root cause in seconds.
Start your free trial of AppDynamics Pro today!
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=48808831&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
_______________________________________________
Net-snmp-coders mailing list
Net-snmp-coders@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-coders

Reply via email to