On Fri, Jan 25, 2019 at 11:37 AM Magnus Fromreide <ma...@lysator.liu.se>
wrote:

> On Sun, Oct 28, 2018 at 01:54:22PM -0700, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > As you may have noticed multiple people asked to add SO_BINDTODEVICE
> support
> > to Net-SNMP. This patch series adds such support by allowing to specify
> the
> > name of the network interface to bind a Net-SNMP endpoint to as
> > "@<interface name>". An example:
> >
> > agent/snmpd -Mmibs -f -Lo -c .../snmpd.conf udp6:localhost@lo:1161 -r
> > apps/snmpwalk -Mmibs -v2c -cpublic udp6:localhost:1161 .1
>
> I have no real feeling one way or the other over the patch per se but I
> am wondering if the clash with virtual interface names on linux (e.g.
> lo:1) makes the choosen syntax problematic for the interface name
> parser?
>

This syntax is obsolete.  The supported mechanism is to use iproute2 to
manage multiple addresses/prefixes per interface.

  Bill
_______________________________________________
Net-snmp-coders mailing list
Net-snmp-coders@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-coders

Reply via email to