On Tue, 25 May 2004 20:22:57 +0200 Xavier wrote:
XB> I wonder if anyone ever tried to delay a SET action?
I haven't tried it, but I think it should work.
XB> What happens, is mode MODE_SET_RESERVE1 seems to be never answered.
XB>
XB> The master agent ends-up the connection, but the sub-agent (AgentX)
XB> never ends it's transaction, and I keep receiving again and again the
XB> same transaction (requests->transaction_id is always the same).
The master will retry after a timeout. To increase the timeout, add this line
to your snmpd.conf:
agentxtimeout #
Where # would be the number of seconds you expect your longest request to
process (plus a little fudge factor).
--
Robert Story; NET-SNMP Junkie <http://www.net-snmp.org/>
<irc://irc.freenode.net/#net-snmp>
Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum=net-snmp-users>
You are lost in a twisty maze of little standards, all different.
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by: Oracle 10g
Get certified on the hottest thing ever to hit the market... Oracle 10g.
Take an Oracle 10g class now, and we'll give you the exam FREE.
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=3149&alloc_id=8166&op=click
_______________________________________________
Net-snmp-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please see the following page to unsubscribe or change other options:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-users
